How Low Will We Stoop

     Why don’t we leave the near and dear ones of our political opponents out of political quarrels?

     Some years ago, India’s political discourse reached a point where, whenever debaters ran out of valid arguments, they would stoop to hurling abuse at their rivals’ family members—especially on women and children who had absolutely nothing to do with politics. The more cowardly choice of targeting those who could not or would not retaliate seemed to come naturally to such people.

     Suppose the wickedness of such remarks were represented by shades of grey. Mild offences would begin with light grey, more malicious ones with darker shades, and the utterly contemptible and unacceptable would lie just short of pitch black. If those responsible are not checked at the very first signs—the lighter greys—they gradually become emboldened. At every subsequent opportunity, they descend further into darker shades until they eventually reach the ultimate: almost-black depths of public discourse.

     It reflects a profound shallowness of character. It reveals a poisoned mind that would rather go for an opponent’s jugular with a verbal dagger than present a reasoned argument. The expression pea-brained could well have been coined to describe such thinking.

     The situation had become so distasteful that I posted an appeal on the then social media platform, Twitter, urging politicians and their supporters to stop this vulgarity. Nothing worthwhile is gained by it except bringing disrepute upon the entire political class and diminishing the dignity of Indian political discourse in the eyes of the world.

     So much for our much-celebated civilisational ideal of “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam”—the belief that the whole world is one family.

     I wrote that appeal without entertaining any illusion that it would produce dramatic change. Yet it was important that politicians know how deeply many ordinary citizens were repulsed by such behaviour. Public representatives should hear the voices of those who object to the erosion of basic decency.

     It is bad enough that, after elections, democracy often settles into a familiar pattern where the rulers and the opposition quickly resume their political battles, treating the nation as their exclusive arena for conflict. The voters—supposedly the true sovereigns in a democracy—quickly fade into the background. One side becomes “they,” while the other becomes “we.”

     Until the next election, that is often how things remain.

     This reality also raises an important concern regarding the proposal for ONOP (One Nation, One Poll). If the entire country completes all its elections within a span of four to six weeks, the electorate may effectively lose one of its few recurring opportunities to register its approval or dissatisfaction with governments. At present, elections to different legislatures occur at different times, allowing voters to periodically express their views on public policies and political conduct.

     With ONOP, that democratic barometer would largely disappear. We would be left with:  

             1. At Poll time: politicians on their best behaviour.         
             2. With Polls over: the people scarcely matter for the next five years.

     The tweet to which I have referred deliberately mentioned individuals from different political backgrounds. It was never about defending one party or attacking another. It was a heartfelt appeal that politicians leave the loved ones of their rivals outside the battlefield of politics.

     Among those I mentioned were Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, who has often been targeted simply because she is the mother of Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi; Mrs. Smriti Irani, whose residence’s front door was reportedly pounded upon in her absence, terrifying her young daughter who was at home; Mrs. Jaya Bachchan, who has frequently been subjected to personal attacks; and Mr. Narendra Modi, whose elderly mother became the subject of offensive remarks despite having no role in politics herself.

     Today, that disturbing trend appears to have gathered momentum once again—with even greater intensity and shamelessness. The abuse has grown uglier, the threats more sinister, and, on some occasions, even rape threats have been shouted openly before television cameras. The fact that such conduct is being recorded no longer seems to deter the perpetrators.

     If public life has reached a point where holding political office—or being politically connected—is perceived as offering protection from the ordinary consequences of the law, one cannot help but ask:

     How low are we prepared to stoop?

     Much lower, and we may well find ourselves entering the ground head first.

     Entering our own graves?

     Possibly.

                                                                            *****

#HowLowWillWeStoop #PoliticalCivility #CivilDiscourse #PoliticsWithDignity #RespectInPolitics #DemocraticValues #PublicDiscourse #PoliticalEthics #HealthyDemocracy #CivilityMatter #KeepFamiliesOutOfPolitics #FamiliesAreNotTargets #NoPersonalAttacks #DebateDontDefame #WordsMatter #StopPoliticalAbuse #ChooseReason #RespectOpponents #StandForDecency #HumanityFirst #IndianDemocracy #IndiaSpeaks #PoliticsInIndia  #PoliticalReform #DemocracyInAction #VasudhaivaKutumbakam #WeThePeople #ResponsiblePolitics #ConstitutionalValues

4 Comments

  1. Nandkishor

    एकदम सटीक टिप्पणी

  2. Shashi

    Political Rivalry Should Not Mean Personal Abuse

    Political rivalry is an essential part of democracy, but the increasing use of abusive and derogatory language by political leaders and supporters is a worrying trend. Healthy debate should focus on policies, governance, and public welfare—not personal insults or character attacks.

    When political discourse is reduced to name-calling, real issues are overshadowed, public trust declines, and society becomes more polarized. Such language also sets a poor example for younger generations, who may begin to see abuse as an acceptable form of expression.

    Strong criticism is a democratic right, but it can be expressed firmly without sacrificing dignity or respect. Political opponents are rivals in ideas, not enemies. A vibrant democracy is strengthened by reasoned arguments, not by the loudest insults.

    Civility in public life is not a sign of weakness; it is a reflection of political maturity and respect for democratic values.

  3. Pawan Kapur

    Totally agree with you brother. The basic decency has evaporated and spoiling the basic tenets of democracy.
    This is a dangerous trend . It doesn’t end here . We have to have civic sense cultivated, having 18% of the world population and one of the youngest in age . What s the use of having one of the oldest civilization with all norms of ideal living having been mentioned.
    Im dealing with EU countries for food processed and aroma and fragrance products . None of them are having the ingredients as mentioned on the packaging. Leave alone Indian companies even Multinational companies are into similar game . They have under same different set of quality for same products. Taking advantage of our weaknesses.

    • So true. It is always truly said that it is easy to exploit a house divided. And we seem to be least bothered by letting the World know that we are a very divided country of very different communities. Because nowadays in our country everything revolves around politics, and politics makes it possible for every country to in any case come to know how divided India really is, through their intelligence networks. There was a time when such things were done under wraps, but now the gloves are off and everything is done openly. We are now no longer shy of exposing our differences to the world. In fact it has become our visiting card. “Come, we will give you special treatment is what we say to others. Tax holidays for you while we squeeze the last ounce of energy from our own people to keep our stoves burning.

      Thank you for your very enlightened feedback.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *